Anybody that accepts to be President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo is an Enemy to Ikwerre people ~Ogbakor Ikwerre Worldwide

 In a recent development, Ogbakor Ikwerre Worldwide has issued a stern warning, declaring that any individual who accepts the position of President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo is considered an adversary to the Ikwerre people. This proclamation underscores the deep-seated tensions and complex dynamics between the Ikwerre community and the broader Igbo socio-cultural organization.



The Ikwerre, an ethnic group predominantly located in Rivers State, Nigeria, have historically maintained a distinct identity, often expressing concerns over perceived marginalization within larger Igbo associations. The statement from Ogbakor Ikwerre Worldwide reflects these apprehensions, suggesting that leadership alignment with Ohanaeze Ndigbo may be viewed as a betrayal of Ikwerre interests.


This development comes amid ongoing discussions about the leadership succession within Ohanaeze Ndigbo following the demise of its former President-General, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu. Various factions and state chapters, including those from Rivers State, have been vocal about their aspirations and entitlements to the apex position, citing constitutional provisions and historical precedents. 


The pronouncement by Ogbakor Ikwerre Worldwide adds a layer of complexity to the succession discourse, potentially influencing the dynamics of candidate selection and the unity of the organization. It also highlights the intricate interplay of ethnic identities and political affiliations within Nigeria's socio-cultural landscape.


As the January 10, 2025, election date for the new President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo approaches, stakeholders are urged to navigate these sensitivities with diplomacy and a commitment to inclusivity. The outcome of this leadership transition will undoubtedly have significant implications for inter-ethnic relations and the future cohesion of the organization.


In light of these developments, it is imperative for all parties involved to engage in constructive dialogue, ensuring that the selection process not only adheres to constitutional guidelines but also respects the diverse sentiments of the constituent communities. Such an approach will be essential in fostering unity and advancing the collective interests of the region. 








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding”

Image
Headline: “Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding” Introduction: In 2025, a war is being waged in our soil—not with bullets, but with biotech. Multinational corporations sell genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as the logical successor to selective breeding, packaging the shift as innovation rather than infiltration. But beneath the surface lies a startling truth: GMOs and traditional breeding are not cousins—they are ideological opposites. While one is evolution by human partnership, the other is patent-protected conquest. The real story isn’t about food. It’s about control. This isn’t just a tale of crops and laboratories. It’s the architecture of a global monopoly—one built on secrecy, engineered dependency, and legislative sleight of hand. To understand today’s battle over food sovereignty, we must unearth the hybrid history they never meant to germinate. The Roots Beneath the Soil: A Quiet Revolution in Genetic Po...
Read more

History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashe

Image
  Borderlines of Power: The Secret History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashes and the Real War in 2025 Introduction: The Smoke Isn’t New—Just the Fire In July 2025, gunfire once again echoed across the Thai-Cambodian border. To the casual observer, it’s just another Southeast Asian flare-up—an unfortunate clash between neighboring militaries over vague lines and national pride. But beneath the dust and headlines lies a haunting continuity: this is not just about territory. It’s about centuries of stolen sovereignty, post-colonial betrayal, secret treaties, and a 21st-century proxy war playing out under the banner of nationalism. This isn’t just another border dispute. It’s a geopolitical feedback loop—engineered, ignored, and now igniting the region once more. Part I: The Colonial Blueprint – How France and Britain Drew Blood With Pens The origins of today’s Thai-Cambodian friction trace back not to modern-day parliaments, but to colonial drawing rooms and imperial expeditions. I...
Read more