Nnamdi Kanu Accuses Justice Binta Nyako of Judicial Bias in Petition to NJC

 Nnamdi Kanu Accuses Justice Binta Nyako of Judicial Bias in Petition to NJC

Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has formally petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC), alleging judicial misconduct and bias by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja.The petition, dated January 13, 2024, was addressed to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, who also serves as the Chairman of the NJC.



Allegations of Judicial Misconduct

In his petition, Kanu contends that Justice Nyako's actions during his trial have caused him "incalculable and continuing damage," including the deprivation of his liberty.He specifically accuses the judge of refusing to reinstate his bail, despite a Supreme Court ruling that mandated his release. Kanu argues that this refusal constitutes a violation of Section 287(1) of the Nigerian Constitution, which mandates that decisions of the Supreme Court be enforced by all authorities and courts.

Details of the Petition

The petition, supported by an affidavit sworn by Kanu's brother, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, outlines several allegations against Justice Nyako:

  • Refusal to Reinstate Bail: Kanu claims that Justice Nyako's refusal to restore his bail, despite the Supreme Court's directive, amounts to judicial fraud and non-adherence to the Constitution.Violation of Constitutional Rights: He alleges that the judge's conduct disregards constitutional provisions and the rule of law, infringing upon his fundamental rights.

  • Failure to Enforce Supreme Court Decision: Kanu asserts that Justice Nyako's actions demonstrate a failure to enforce the Supreme Court's decision, thereby undermining the authority of the apex court.

Background of the Case

Nnamdi Kanu has been facing a seven-count terrorism charge brought against him by the Federal Government.His trial has been marked by legal controversies, including the revocation of his bail and his subsequent extradition from Kenya to Nigeria.The Supreme Court had previously ruled that Kanu's absence from court was not intentional, attributing it to the invasion of his home by military officers.Despite this ruling, Kanu alleges that Justice Nyako has failed to reinstate his bail, leading to his continued detention.






Implications for the Judiciary

Kanu's petition raises significant concerns about judicial independence and the adherence to constitutional mandates within Nigeria's legal system.The NJC's response to this petition could have far-reaching implications for the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, especially regarding the enforcement of Supreme Court decisions and the protection of individual rights.

The allegations presented by Nnamdi Kanu against Justice Binta Nyako highlight critical issues within Nigeria's judicial system, particularly concerning the enforcement of Supreme Court decisions and the protection of fundamental rights. As the NJC reviews this petition, the legal community and the public await a resolution that upholds the principles of justice and constitutional integrity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding”

Image
Headline: “Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding” Introduction: In 2025, a war is being waged in our soil—not with bullets, but with biotech. Multinational corporations sell genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as the logical successor to selective breeding, packaging the shift as innovation rather than infiltration. But beneath the surface lies a startling truth: GMOs and traditional breeding are not cousins—they are ideological opposites. While one is evolution by human partnership, the other is patent-protected conquest. The real story isn’t about food. It’s about control. This isn’t just a tale of crops and laboratories. It’s the architecture of a global monopoly—one built on secrecy, engineered dependency, and legislative sleight of hand. To understand today’s battle over food sovereignty, we must unearth the hybrid history they never meant to germinate. The Roots Beneath the Soil: A Quiet Revolution in Genetic Po...
Read more

History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashe

Image
  Borderlines of Power: The Secret History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashes and the Real War in 2025 Introduction: The Smoke Isn’t New—Just the Fire In July 2025, gunfire once again echoed across the Thai-Cambodian border. To the casual observer, it’s just another Southeast Asian flare-up—an unfortunate clash between neighboring militaries over vague lines and national pride. But beneath the dust and headlines lies a haunting continuity: this is not just about territory. It’s about centuries of stolen sovereignty, post-colonial betrayal, secret treaties, and a 21st-century proxy war playing out under the banner of nationalism. This isn’t just another border dispute. It’s a geopolitical feedback loop—engineered, ignored, and now igniting the region once more. Part I: The Colonial Blueprint – How France and Britain Drew Blood With Pens The origins of today’s Thai-Cambodian friction trace back not to modern-day parliaments, but to colonial drawing rooms and imperial expeditions. I...
Read more