Xi Jinping Condemns Trump’s Gaza Takeover Plan, Backs Palestinian Rule Amid Global Backlash

 

Xi Jinping Condemns Trump’s Gaza Takeover Plan, Backs Palestinian Rule Amid Global Backlash

China Stands Firm Against U.S. Proposal to Remove Palestinians from Gaza

Beijing has taken a resolute stand against former U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to take over the Gaza Strip and permanently relocate its Palestinian residents. Chinese President Xi Jinping has denounced the plan, reaffirming China’s unwavering support for Palestinian self-rule and a two-state solution.



Trump’s remarks, made during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggested transforming Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East” by resettling over two million Palestinians in neighboring countries. The proposal has ignited global condemnation, with many world leaders labeling it a violation of international law and a direct affront to Palestinian sovereignty.

China Rejects Forced Palestinian Relocation

China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, issued a strong statement condemning the proposal, stating:

"China has always believed that Palestinian rule is the basic principle of post-war governance in Gaza."

He reaffirmed Beijing’s opposition to any forced displacement of Gaza’s population, emphasizing that a lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be built upon the foundation of a two-state solution.

Beijing’s stance aligns with its broader foreign policy principles, which emphasize national sovereignty, non-interference, and diplomatic resolutions to geopolitical crises.

International Leaders Unite Against Trump’s Gaza Plan

The proposed U.S. intervention in Gaza has drawn fierce opposition from key international players:

  • Saudi Arabia swiftly rejected any attempt to force Palestinians from their homeland, stressing that displacement would destabilize the region.
  • Turkey denounced the plan as “unacceptable” and a violation of Palestinian rights.
  • France warned that such a move could escalate tensions and deepen humanitarian suffering.



Russia also weighed in on the controversy, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov emphasizing Moscow’s commitment to a two-state solution:

"This is the thesis enshrined in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and is supported by the overwhelming majority of nations."

U.S. and Palestinian Responses to Trump’s Proposal

While some Republican figures have lauded Trump’s vision as a bold step toward peace, others have voiced deep concern. Critics argue that forcibly removing Gaza’s residents could be seen as ethnic cleansing and may further inflame tensions in an already volatile region.

Palestinian leaders have unequivocally rejected the proposal. A Hamas official dismissed Trump’s remarks as “ridiculous and absurd,” warning that such actions could “ignite further unrest.” Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has called on the United Nations to intervene and safeguard Palestinian rights.

China’s Diplomatic Strategy in the Middle East

China’s vocal opposition to Trump’s Gaza plan underscores its growing influence in Middle Eastern diplomacy. By championing Palestinian sovereignty, Beijing positions itself as a key advocate for balanced and just conflict resolution. This move also strengthens China’s strategic partnerships in the Arab world, where support for Palestinian self-determination remains a core diplomatic priority.

As global condemnation mounts, the future of Trump’s controversial proposal remains uncertain. With China, Russia, and key Middle Eastern nations standing firmly against it, the international community is now at a crossroads, debating the path forward for Gaza’s future and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding”

    Image
    Headline: “Seeds of Control: How GMO Agriculture Quietly Rewired the World While Hiding Behind Selective Breeding” Introduction: In 2025, a war is being waged in our soil—not with bullets, but with biotech. Multinational corporations sell genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as the logical successor to selective breeding, packaging the shift as innovation rather than infiltration. But beneath the surface lies a startling truth: GMOs and traditional breeding are not cousins—they are ideological opposites. While one is evolution by human partnership, the other is patent-protected conquest. The real story isn’t about food. It’s about control. This isn’t just a tale of crops and laboratories. It’s the architecture of a global monopoly—one built on secrecy, engineered dependency, and legislative sleight of hand. To understand today’s battle over food sovereignty, we must unearth the hybrid history they never meant to germinate. The Roots Beneath the Soil: A Quiet Revolution in Genetic Po...
    Read more

    History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashe

    Image
      Borderlines of Power: The Secret History Behind Thai-Cambodian Clashes and the Real War in 2025 Introduction: The Smoke Isn’t New—Just the Fire In July 2025, gunfire once again echoed across the Thai-Cambodian border. To the casual observer, it’s just another Southeast Asian flare-up—an unfortunate clash between neighboring militaries over vague lines and national pride. But beneath the dust and headlines lies a haunting continuity: this is not just about territory. It’s about centuries of stolen sovereignty, post-colonial betrayal, secret treaties, and a 21st-century proxy war playing out under the banner of nationalism. This isn’t just another border dispute. It’s a geopolitical feedback loop—engineered, ignored, and now igniting the region once more. Part I: The Colonial Blueprint – How France and Britain Drew Blood With Pens The origins of today’s Thai-Cambodian friction trace back not to modern-day parliaments, but to colonial drawing rooms and imperial expeditions. I...
    Read more