Shariah Council Defends Ramadan School Closures: A Deeper Look into Policy, Public Reaction, and Long-Term Impacts

The Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria (SCSN) has publicly defended the decision by various Northern state governments to close schools during the holy month of Ramadan. While officials emphasize that this measure is designed to protect students from extreme heat and allow them to observe fasting without academic strain, critics argue that it sets a concerning precedent for religious influence in education. This investigative report delves into the rationale, legal framework, stakeholder perspectives, and broader implications of this policy shift.

Across Nigeria’s northern states—particularly Zamfara, Sokoto, Jigawa, and Katsina—education ministries have announced temporary school closures coinciding with Ramadan. This decision, largely endorsed by the Shariah Council, has sparked intense debate.

The Case for School Closures: Protecting Students Amidst Harsh Conditions

The Shariah Council and state authorities cite two primary reasons for the closures:

1. Extreme Heat and Student Safety

   • Northern Nigeria experiences some of its highest temperatures during Ramadan, sometimes exceeding 40°C (104°F).
   • Prolonged heat exposure, combined with daytime fasting, increases the risk of dehydration, heat exhaustion, and heatstroke—especially among young students.
   • Medical experts warn that children’s bodies struggle to regulate heat as efficiently as adults, making them vulnerable in sweltering classrooms.

2. Religious and Cultural Considerations

   • Ramadan holds spiritual and communal significance for Muslim families, and many parents welcome the school closures as an opportunity for children to engage in religious activities.
   • Supporters argue that modifying academic schedules to accommodate fasting students reflects a culturally sensitive approach to education, aligning school policies with societal norms.

While many Muslim parents and religious organizations back the move, secular groups, Christian associations, and educational reform advocates express concerns.

The Critics: “Education Should Remain Uninterrupted”

• The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) warns that aligning school schedules with religious observances could set a dangerous precedent for faith-based academic policies.
• Human rights groups argue that state governments should focus on improving education quality rather than modifying schedules based on religious considerations.
• Educational consultants caution that disruptions in learning, even temporarily, can affect academic performance—particularly in under-resourced public schools.

The Supporters: “It’s a Sensible and Temporary Adjustment”

• Many Northern parents and Islamic organizations applaud the decision, calling it a reasonable accommodation for religious fasting.
• Local community leaders emphasize that schools often struggle with attendance during Ramadan regardless—making official closures a practical acknowledgment of reality.
• State governments assure that lost time will be recovered through schedule adjustments, including shortening long vacations.

The Education Law of January 1, 1964, grants Nigerian state governments full authority over school calendars, except in federal institutions or states with overriding policies.

State vs. Federal Control Over Education

• Northern governors have the legal right to declare school holidays for reasons ranging from public health concerns to cultural and religious observances.
• The federal government and external organizations have limited influence over state-level education decisions.

Given these provisions, legal experts argue that CAN and other opposition voices lack formal grounds to challenge the policy.

---

International Comparisons: How Do Other Muslim-Majority Nations Handle This?

To place Nigeria’s decision in a global context, let’s compare how other predominantly Muslim nations accommodate education during Ramadan.

Country	School Policy During Ramadan	Key Justification
Saudi Arabia	Shortened school hours but no closures.	Balancing education with religious practice.
Egypt	Normal academic calendar; exams rescheduled to non-fasting hours.	Ensuring continuity while accommodating fasting students.
Pakistan	Some schools close early, others adjust breaks.	Depends on regional climate and local policies.
UAE	Schools operate with reduced hours; flexibility for younger students.	Maintaining a balance between education and religious observance.

Nigeria’s approach is arguably more drastic than that of these nations, where adjustments are made without full closures.

The decision to annually close schools during Ramadan could have lasting consequences:

1. Academic Disruptions

   • Frequent breaks can slow curriculum coverage, especially in public schools with limited resources.
   • Exam schedules may need to be continuously adjusted, affecting consistency.

2. Precedent for Religious-Based Policy Changes

   • Critics warn that using religious grounds for policy decisions could extend to other areas of governance.
   • Could lead to further demands for faith-based modifications in education and workplace policies.

3. Potential for Expanded Implementation

   • If successful, school closures during Ramadan could become a norm across more states, making it a permanent shift in Nigeria’s academic calendar.

Instead of outright closures, education experts recommend alternative strategies that balance education and religious considerations.

1. Reduce School Hours Instead of Closing

   • Many nations implement a half-day system, allowing students to attend morning classes and return home before peak heat hours.

2. Exemption Policies for Fasting Students

   • Schools could offer optional attendance or lighter academic loads for fasting students, rather than shutting down completely.

3. Shifting Academic Calendars Nationwide

   • If Ramadan closures become a standard policy, adjusting Nigeria’s overall academic calendar to avoid key exam periods during Ramadan may be necessary.

The Shariah Council and Northern state governments defend the school closures as a necessary measure to protect students and accommodate religious observances. However, critics warn of potential long-term consequences for education, governance, and policy precedents.

As Nigeria navigates this complex issue, a balanced approach—one that ensures both academic progress and respect for cultural and religious practices—is essential.

This investigative report is based on statements from the Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria (SCSN), Northern state education ministries, legal analysts, and international education models.